The data set used by Dr Roger Shand to prepare the coastal erosion report that has devalued 1800 properties based worst case scenario data and not taking into account other data relating to accretion. This report has not been appropriately peer reviewed and requests from the rate payers for KCDC to provide the data have been refused. This data is paid for and owned by the ratepayers and should be made public considering the impact it has had.

Provide ratepayers with the ability to have the report properly peer reviewed. Enable other more qualified experts to provide a balanced view. The opening of it would also allow the rightful owners (the ratepayers who paid for it) to view it.

That KCDC is showing respect to the people that employ them and treat them fairly and makes decisions made on sound science and data.